Sunday, May 13, 2007

How Do I Do A Chinese Bangs

THE PALACE AT WAR: Prince Harry and the media coverage of the war iraquena

is approaching departure for Iraq of Prince Harry, third in the royal succession to the throne of England. Among the news of delays to the threats of Al Qaeda, intent on capturing and show it as a "war trophy", the support of fellow soldiers who said they want to wear "red wig" in order to treat the identification and abduction, the pre-departure party, the British tabloids have collected a new chapter in the lucrative soap on the royal family. In addition, the prince will be included in its adventure iraquena dallla cameras, in a sort of Big Brother iraqueno, where to be appointed but they are only civilians in bombing raids.
Too bad the story of the prince who goes to war is far from a soap opera, but it fits very superficially in a context like that iraqueno, made up of thousands of civilian casualties, as well as military. The media coverage so the departure of the prince neglects to consider the everyday iraquena, made up of dozens of deaths and destruction, as daily life is far from being a scoop a news to sell. In addition, the scruples for the safety of the prince, and his presence in Iraq can only increase insecurity and danger to an army torturer and victim of a conflict-sac.
The Royal Family chooses so to get going against public opinion, whose opposition to the growing conflict iraqueno venture led to the resignation of Tony Blair.
But the worst aspect of the story that goes from the palace of the prince to war "to serve their country" with all the vagaries of contour gifts (or parts or leave the army, "said Harry), is that the media attention on Iraq has now reached the frivolous tone that characterize the events gifts. The final piece of a conflict right from the start, by the fall of Saddam Hussein's statue in Baghdad was taken flash of a great television commercial, aimed at selling a war based on economic and geostrategic interests. And like all the commercials, this one has been able to sell smoke, but to a country that is on fire every day.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Dyshidrotic Eczema Ph

FAMILY DAY: AND THE FAMILY?

A few days Family Day, an event organized by the Roman Church Association "against any suggestion of legislative equality of unmarried couples with the family based on marriage," is wasting the confirmation of participation of the political world, who got to do so with the "traditional" family to have more of 'one. For every action a reaction: it beside the Don Abbondio of the situation, both clerical and political calculation, the "moderates" who forget that the "center" is relative to what it takes to end, here are the handful of contromanifestanti "NO VAT". Between clericalism and secularism, pro-family man man man woman child and family are almost all children, with one absent: the family. Why Family Day to the real family, one affected by the syndrome of "Third week" stay at home, away from ideology alien to their real needs, that the pull into play mostly for instrumental purposes. between the two litigants in the Family day the only one not enjoying it is the protagonist, the family, poised between slices of promises " hoards" of the sconticini first house, he sees far from their priorities the allocation of "traditional family" of "unmarried couple" or I say. The Family Day wants to say as "the priority is not the policies but DiCo the family "perhaps forgetting that DiCo allocate tax relief for couples, but perhaps here more than the" family policies "are questioning the definition of" family "and personal freedom, belief and choice. You accuse DiCo to question the family based on marriage to the Constitution, but perhaps the opposition to DiCo questions the Constitution, at least for his defense of individual self and its freedom to profess opinions, beliefs religious and personal choices without discrimination.

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Design Wrestling Gear Online

THANKS

thank those who, following and appreciating the communitaction work has helped to bring the blog nominated for "Best male Z-blog" in competition "Z Blog Awards" organized by sw4n.net . Thanks in this regard can only go bloglibero , I work and who contributed decisively to give visibility to communitaction . Certainly a satisfaction for a blog started just over six months, but mostly because it gives confirmation that the postings have passed, and this is the most important thing to know is why the first step to act on behalf of the rights.

Monday, April 16, 2007

Ladainain Tomlinson Facemask

trigger-happy: the massacres in U.S. schools and the culture of violence

The massacre today in a U.S. college, after a shooting that caused dozens of deaths, is just the latest of similar episodes that periodically hit the United States. The tragedy will raise a hornet's nest of opinions and accusations, which are useful to fill seats and to straighten the audience of U.S. talk show, everything as in 1999 when the Columbine massacre shook the imaginary American Institute, linked to the idea of \u200b\u200bschool as means of escaping violence in the ghettos of the shootings. The wonder that violence explode as well, in an unexpected place, seemingly without warning, makes the mistake of confining these cases diverted to the mind of some young boys, as if listening to a certain type of music, bad company, or some mental disorder adolescent could justify a massacre. The scope of incidents like this is not so as to reduce a phenomenon on a personal basis, but perhaps in a malaise that affects American society as a whole, including the ease of gun ownership is just a corollary. Michael Moore in Bowling for Columbine, a documentary about the Columbine massacre, said the reason that the U.S. has a number of murders per capita three to four times higher than the European countries (see articles PeaceReporter: art. 1 and art. 2) with the presence and easy availability weapons state, a view supported by study at Harvard School of Public Health. Certainly the availability of weapons for all the violence can help you realize that the common person can try, but perhaps the problem should be tackled at its root. These phenomena are united by two things: it happens in places of training, and are made by young people. If a state like the United States is hit at home, by the people who are its future, and right in a symbol of their growth as citizens, is then to think that there is something wrong with the values \u200b\u200bthat in general ' Education and the U.S. mass media transmit to their generations. Will then just the statement that President George W. Bush will make to the nation on the matter, it is precisely because the U.S. administration and the propaganda that is bound to be legitimate form of behavior that laws in recent years have marked the world affairs: it thinks of the "Act" in the name of defense against terrorism justifies the restriction of rights (like privacy) of U.S. citizens, or detention without charge at Guantanamo as certain. There is no question the civil law to the possession of a weapon, as set by the U.S. Bill of Rights, but the abuse of rights that characterizes U.S. foreign and domestic policy. If the 'American dream "that the U.S. intends to export is made of war ... and if this is justified for the defense of the Fatherland, was hardly surprising that their children of this culture to be influenced. If violence and abuse are legal means for a state for the resolution of conflicts, it is not surprising that the weapons are seen by citizens a legitimate means of asserting their will. And it is perhaps in this light that you can read the U.S. refusal to abolish the death penalty and to regulate the arms trade: gun violence is not governed only by the political power of the National Rifle Association business and economic generates, but also has its roots in a culture that considers the weapons, or violence in general, half as another, if not the preferred way of confrontation and conflict.