rumors these last days of Anglo-American press (Including New Yorker , Independent ) reported that preparations are at an advanced stage for a military attack on Iran. A possible air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities would only be a development of the Cold War that the U.S. and Israel are pursuing for some time with Iran. Verbal provocations from Iran on the nuclear and the existence of Israel, which the U.S. responded with subtle threats and propaganda about the intentions of an Iranian nuclear attack, we moved U.S. authorization to kill Iranian agents in Iraq . However, beyond these disagreements and a potential nuclear underestimated by the Israelis themselves, the real motive of a possible attack on Iran should be tried in motivation economiche.WJ Clark in the 2003 essay " Revisited: the real reason for the upcoming war with Iraq ", citing as reason of macroeconomic 'attack on Iraq will bring back the dollar as currency, hoping to thwart the intention, expressed in 2000 by OPEC countries like Iran, Iraq and Venezuela (which underwent a coup in the same year), oil trade with the euro, the euro, in addition to being devalued to a lesser extent the dollar is the currency of most countries that share the oil with Iran. In this direction would also represent the government's intention to open an Iranian oil bourse alternative to the two Americans. It 'clear that the conversion oil in euro would enhance economic crisis statunitense.Un second set of considerations about the economic reasons behind the decision to attack Iran is based precisely on the' war economy "in the U.S.. Indeed, escalating terrorism around the world following the attack on Iran would only add fuel to the fire of propaganda of the Bush administration, further legitimizing military ambitions and encouraging more and more the transition, as defined by the Los Angeles Times , the new economy to an economy like the U.S. war . Paradoxically, the revenues of the defense industry, as well as being the motive of the U.S., may be an obstacle to the attack, because Russia and China. The opposition of the two nations on sanctions against Iran is in fact based on substantial energy trade and military that Russia and China have with Iran. If behind plans for war with Iran, apart from many other reasons geopolitical, is the specter of economic reasons, it is clear that the problem must be tackled at its root, not only by cutting the link between economic recovery, employment and development of war (think of the propaganda of hundreds of new jobs that would provide the Dal Molin base in Vicenza), but also a continuous work for demilitarization and conversion to civilian areas, and funds appropriated for war costs (as in the 2006 Budget ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment